Every meaningful innovation begins with a simple observation. A student notices that an elderly grandparent struggles to climb stairs, a farmer wastes time carrying water manually, or a classroom lacks an efficient way to save electricity. These everyday challenges often inspire ideas that have the potential to improve lives.

The INSPIRE MANAK Scheme 2026–27 provides school students with a unique platform to transform such observations into science- and technology-based innovations. Rather than rewarding textbook experiments or conventional science fair models, the scheme encourages original thinking, problem-solving, and practical innovation.

If you’re looking for reliable educational resources beyond this guide, PYQLY.COM publishes authentic educational articles, study materials, CBSE/KVS/NVS resources, lesson plans, Olympiad guidance, government education updates, question papers, notes, and other learning resources designed for students, teachers, parents, and schools.

Whether you are a student with an innovative idea, a teacher guiding young innovators, a principal responsible for school nominations, or a parent encouraging creativity at home, this comprehensive guide will help you understand every important aspect of the INSPIRE-MANAK Scheme for the 2026–27 academic year.

What is the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme?

The INSPIRE MANAK (Million Minds Augmenting National Aspirations and Knowledge) Scheme is an innovation programme of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, implemented in collaboration with the National Innovation Foundation (NIF) – India. It encourages students from Classes VI to XII to identify real-life problems and develop original science- and technology-based solutions.

Unlike ordinary science competitions that often reward well-presented demonstrations of known scientific concepts, INSPIRE-MANAK focuses on originality.

Students are expected to:

• Observe problems in everyday life
• Think scientifically
• Design practical solutions
• Present innovative ideas rather than copied projects

The programme aims to nurture a culture of innovation from the school level and create future scientists, inventors, entrepreneurs, and problem-solvers.

What Does INSPIRE MANAK Stand For?

INSPIRE stands for:

Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research

MANAK stands for:

Million Minds Augmenting National Aspirations and Knowledge

Together, the programme seeks to inspire millions of school students to use scientific thinking to solve practical problems faced by society.

Who Implements the Scheme?

According to the official programme information, the scheme is jointly implemented by:

Organization	Role
Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India	Policy formulation and overall implementation
National Innovation Foundation (NIF) – India	Evaluation, mentoring, exhibitions, prototype support, and innovation ecosystem

This partnership ensures that promising student ideas receive opportunities beyond the school level, including mentoring and prototype development.

Vision Behind the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme

India is home to millions of young learners who encounter practical problems in their surroundings every day. However, many innovative ideas remain unexplored because students often lack opportunities, guidance, or platforms to develop them.

The INSPIRE MANAK Scheme addresses this gap by encouraging students to:

• Observe carefully
• Think critically
• Ask meaningful questions
• Design practical solutions
• Develop confidence in innovation

Instead of asking, “Can you build a model?”, the programme asks a more important question:

“Can you identify a real problem and think of a better solution?”

This shift from memorization to innovation is what makes the scheme unique.

Objectives of the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme

The official objectives of the programme extend beyond organizing competitions. The scheme seeks to build a long-term culture of scientific inquiry and innovation among school students.

1. Promote Scientific Temper

Scientific temper refers to the habit of observing, questioning, experimenting, and drawing logical conclusions.

Students are encouraged to:

• Ask why problems exist.
• Explore scientific explanations.
• Think beyond textbook answers.
• Develop curiosity about how things work.

Why It Matters

Students who develop scientific thinking become better problem-solvers not only in science but also in everyday life.

2. Encourage Original Innovation

Originality is the heart of INSPIRE-MANAK.

Students are encouraged to create ideas that are:

• New
• Practical
• Useful
• Based on real observations

The emphasis is not on expensive models or sophisticated electronics. Even a simple idea can be valuable if it addresses a genuine problem in a unique way.

Remember: Innovation does not always mean inventing something completely new. Improving an existing product in a meaningful way can also qualify as innovation.

3. Solve Real-Life Problems

Many award-winning ideas emerge from challenges faced in daily life.

Examples of areas where innovations can make a difference include:

• Agriculture
• Healthcare
• Education
• Environmental protection
• Transportation
• Rural development
• Household safety
• Accessibility for persons with disabilities
• Water conservation
• Public safety

The programme encourages students to become active contributors to society by designing practical solutions for such issues.

4. Build Future Scientists and Innovators

Exposure to innovation at an early age helps students develop essential skills such as:

• Critical thinking
• Observation
• Creativity
• Logical reasoning
• Design thinking
• Scientific communication
• Problem analysis

These abilities remain valuable regardless of the career path students eventually choose.

5. Strengthen India’s Innovation Ecosystem

According to the programme objectives, promising innovations progressing to advanced stages may receive:

• Expert mentoring
• Prototype development support
• Opportunities to participate in exhibitions
• Incubation support through the National Innovation Foundation for selected innovations

Such initiatives contribute to strengthening India’s long-term scientific and technological capabilities.

Why INSPIRE MANAK Matters Today

The world increasingly values innovation, creativity, and problem-solving.

Schools are no longer expected to produce students who simply remember information. Instead, they are expected to nurture learners who can:

• Think independently
• Solve practical challenges
• Apply scientific knowledge
• Develop solutions that improve lives

INSPIRE-MANAK aligns closely with this educational philosophy by encouraging students to connect classroom learning with real-world applications.

Benefits Beyond the Competition

Even students who do not progress to higher levels gain valuable experience.

Participation helps students:

• Improve observation skills
• Develop confidence
• Learn structured problem-solving
• Communicate ideas effectively
• Work systematically
• Think creatively

These are lifelong skills that benefit students far beyond the competition itself.

INSPIRE MANAK vs Traditional Science Exhibition

One of the most common misconceptions is that INSPIRE-MANAK is simply another science exhibition.

It is not.

The official guidance clearly distinguishes the programme from conventional science fairs.

Traditional Science Exhibition	INSPIRE MANAK
Demonstrates known scientific concepts	Solves real-life problems
Often based on textbooks	Based on original observation
Existing scientific models	New or significantly improved innovation
Focuses on explaining concepts	Focuses on usefulness and originality
Models may be copied	Original thinking is essential
Evaluation emphasizes presentation	Evaluation emphasizes innovation

Projects Generally Not Suitable

The official guidance discourages submissions that merely demonstrate textbook concepts, such as:

• Solar system models
• Photosynthesis demonstrations
• Water cycle models
• Human heart models
• Electric circuit demonstrations
• Volcano models

Although these are excellent educational projects, they generally do not meet the innovation-focused objectives of INSPIRE-MANAK unless they introduce a genuinely original scientific improvement.

Impact of the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme

According to the official programme information, the scheme has achieved significant milestones since its inception.

Achievement	Reported Impact
Student participation	More than 69 lakh students
Registered schools	More than 6 lakh
District coverage	Over 720 districts
Prototype development grants	More than 18 lakh students
Students receiving mentoring	More than 2,600
Patent applications filed	More than 254
Patents granted	51
States and Union Territories covered	All 36
International participation	More than 200 student innovators

These achievements demonstrate the growing reach of the programme and its role in encouraging scientific creativity among school students.

INSPIRE MANAK 2026–27 Important Dates

For the 2026–27 academic year, the officially announced schedule is as follows:

Activity	Date
Online nominations begin	15 July 2026
Last date for nominations	15 September 2026
Nomination portal	E-MIAS (INSPIRE-MANAK)

Important

Schools are advised to complete the nomination process well before the closing date to avoid last-minute technical issues or heavy portal traffic.

Who Can Participate?

The scheme is open to students studying in recognized schools across India.

Eligible institutions include:

• Government schools
• Government-aided schools
• Private schools
• Unaided schools
• Schools affiliated with Central Boards
• Schools affiliated with State Boards

An important feature of the programme is linguistic inclusivity.

According to the official brochure, students may submit their ideas in any of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India, allowing them to express innovative ideas comfortably in their preferred language.

Student Eligibility Criteria

According to the official notification for the 2026–27 cycle, students must satisfy the following conditions:

Eligibility Requirement	Details
Classes	VI to XII
School	Must study in a recognized school
Innovation	Must be original
Theme	Science and technology based
Nomination	Individual student nominations are encouraged

The emphasis throughout the programme remains on originality and practical problem-solving rather than elaborate model construction.

School Nomination Rules

Schools participating in INSPIRE-MANAK should carefully follow the nomination guidelines.

Maximum Number of Nominations

Each registered school may nominate up to five students during the nomination cycle.

Special Rule for Classes XI and XII

Within these five nominations:

• Only two students from the Science Stream of Classes XI and XII combined may be nominated.

This provision helps ensure balanced participation across middle and secondary school levels.

Benefits of Participating in INSPIRE MANAK

Participation offers opportunities that extend well beyond certificates or school recognition.

Depending on the stage of selection, students may receive opportunities such as:

• Recognition for original ideas
• Participation in District Level Exhibition and Project Competition (DLEPC)
• Progression to State Level Exhibition and Project Competition (SLEPC)
• Selection for National Level Exhibition and Project Competition (NLEPC)
• Expert mentoring
• Prototype development support
• Incubation opportunities for selected innovations through the National Innovation Foundation

Did You Know?

A simple but original idea often performs better than an expensive project that merely reproduces an existing concept.

The strength of the idea—not the cost of the model—is what matters most.

Innovation Journey: From School to National Recognition

A student’s innovation typically progresses through several stages.

Observation
        ↓
Idea Generation
        ↓
School-Level Screening
        ↓
Online Nomination
        ↓
District-Level Evaluation
        ↓
State-Level Competition
        ↓
National-Level Exhibition
        ↓
Mentoring & Prototype Development
        ↓
Possible Incubation Support

Each stage focuses on identifying ideas that demonstrate originality, scientific thinking, and practical usefulness.

Responsibilities of Schools

Schools play a crucial role in ensuring that only well-developed and genuinely original ideas are nominated.

According to the official guidance, schools should:

• Conduct an internal review process before nominations.
• Form a committee including science teachers, the INSPIRE nodal teacher, and the Vice-Principal where applicable.
• Evaluate originality, clarity, and alignment with scheme objectives.
• Encourage students to submit supporting sketches, photographs, or working models where appropriate.
• Ensure that the Principal verifies shortlisted projects before submission.
• Complete nominations well before the deadline.

A structured review process improves both the quality and credibility of school nominations.

Expert Tips Before Beginning the Nomination Process

Before students begin preparing projects, schools can significantly improve outcomes by adopting a thoughtful approach.

Encourage Observation Before Construction

Students should first identify a genuine problem before thinking about materials or model design.

Ask “Why?” Repeatedly

Help students understand the root cause of a problem instead of proposing superficial solutions.

Promote Independent Thinking

Teachers should guide students without giving them ready-made project ideas.

Maintain an Innovation Notebook

Students can record observations throughout the year rather than waiting until nominations open.

Focus on Simplicity

An affordable, practical innovation addressing a real problem is often stronger than a complicated model with little practical value.

Complete Student Nomination Process for INSPIRE MANAK 2026–27

Submitting student nominations under the INSPIRE-MANAK Scheme involves much more than filling out an online form. The quality of information entered by the school directly influences how effectively an innovation is understood during evaluation.

Many excellent ideas lose their impact because of incomplete documentation, unclear project descriptions, incorrect student information, or avoidable technical mistakes during submission.

This section explains the entire nomination process in a structured, easy-to-follow manner based on the official guidance and nomination workflow described in the source material.

Quick Answer: How Does the INSPIRE-MANAK Nomination Process Work?

The INSPIRE-MANAK nomination process begins with a school-level idea competition, followed by internal screening of innovative projects. Selected student details, innovation summaries, bank information, and supporting documents are uploaded through the E-MIAS portal by the authorized school authority before the nomination deadline.

Understanding the Nomination Process

Many people believe that students can directly apply for INSPIRE-MANAK.

This is a common misconception.

According to the official process, recognized schools are responsible for nominating eligible students through the E-MIAS portal after conducting an internal screening process. Individual students do not submit nominations independently through the portal.

The nomination journey typically follows this sequence:

Student develops an original idea
            ↓
School conducts Idea Competition
            ↓
Internal Screening Committee evaluates ideas
            ↓
Best innovations shortlisted
            ↓
School uploads nominations on E-MIAS Portal
            ↓
District-level scrutiny
            ↓
Further evaluation at higher levels

This structured approach ensures that only well-prepared and genuinely innovative ideas move forward.

Before You Begin: Prepare Everything in Advance

One of the most effective ways to avoid last-minute problems is to collect all required documents before logging into the portal.

Schools often spend unnecessary time searching for missing documents during online submission.

Preparing documents beforehand makes the entire process smoother and minimizes the risk of errors.

Documents Required for Each Student

Document	Mandatory	Purpose
Passport-size photograph	✔ Yes	Student identification
Innovation synopsis	✔ Yes	Explains the original idea
Student bank account details	✔ Yes	Financial processing, where applicable
Bank passbook copy	✔ Yes	Verification of bank details
IFSC Code	✔ Yes	Bank identification
Account Number	✔ Yes	Direct transfer details
Project photographs	Optional	Better understanding of the innovation
Prototype photographs	Optional	Demonstrates development
Sketches or design diagrams	Optional	Helps explain the concept
Short demonstration video	Optional	Provides additional clarity

Although some supporting materials are optional, including them can help evaluators better understand the proposed innovation where appropriate.

Create a Student Document Folder

A practical approach for schools is to maintain one digital folder for each nominated student.

The folder may include:

• Student photograph
• Innovation synopsis
• Passbook copy
• Supporting images
• Sketches
• Video (if available)

This simple practice makes uploading documents significantly easier and reduces confusion.

Step 1: Access the INSPIRE MANAK Portal

After completing the school-level screening process, the authorized school authority logs into the E-MIAS portal.

The general login process includes:

1. Open the INSPIRE-MANAK portal.
2. Choose Authorised Login.
3. Select School Authority.
4. Enter:
   • User ID
   • Password
   • Captcha
5. Click Login.

Only registered schools can access the nomination module. Schools that are not registered must complete the prescribed registration process before submitting nominations.

Best Practice

Avoid logging in for the first time on the final day.

Schools should verify login credentials well before the nomination deadline to avoid unexpected issues.

Step 2: Open the Student Nomination Module

Once logged in successfully, the school dashboard provides access to various services.

Select:

Student Nomination or Nominate Students

This opens the workspace where nominations for the current academic session are managed.

What Happens Next?

The portal guides the school through multiple stages:

• School-level competition details
• Student information
• Project details
• Bank information
• Document uploads
• Final authorization
• Submission

Completing each section carefully is essential before proceeding to the next.

Step 3: Conduct and Record the School-Level Idea Competition

One of the most important expectations under the scheme is that schools should first conduct an internal idea competition before nominating students.

The portal requests information confirming that this process has been completed.

Typical information may include:

• Number of students who participated
• Whether the competition was conducted
• Whether internal screening has been completed

After entering these details, the school proceeds by selecting Save & Continue.

Why Is an Internal Idea Competition Important?

The internal competition ensures that nominations represent the school’s best innovations rather than random submissions.

It also encourages broader participation, allowing many students to share ideas before only a few are shortlisted.

Benefits of Conducting an Internal Competition

• Encourages creativity across classes.
• Promotes fair selection.
• Identifies hidden talent.
• Improves the overall quality of nominations.
• Builds an innovation culture within the school.

Internal Review Committee

The source material recommends that schools establish an internal review committee before uploading nominations. This committee may include:

Committee Member	Suggested Role
Science Teachers	Evaluate scientific basis
INSPIRE Nodal Teacher	Coordinate the process
Vice-Principal	Academic oversight
Principal	Final approval

The committee evaluates ideas for:

• Originality
• Scientific basis
• Practical usefulness
• Clarity
• Alignment with the objectives of INSPIRE-MANAK

Expert Tip

Rather than selecting projects based on appearance or model quality, evaluate whether the innovation genuinely addresses a real-world problem.

Step 4: Add Student Details

After completing the school-level information, schools begin entering details for each shortlisted student.

Select:

Add Student

A detailed student information form will open.

Personal Information Required

Schools should carefully enter information exactly as it appears in official school records.

Common details include:

• Student Name
• Father’s Name
• Mother’s Name
• Date of Birth
• Gender
• Category
• Class
• Stream (where applicable)

Even small spelling mistakes can create verification issues later.

Best Practice

Cross-check information with:

• Admission register
• School database
• Student identity records

Consistency across records helps prevent future discrepancies.

Step 5: Enter Project Details

This is the most important section of the nomination.

The evaluator first understands the innovation through the information entered here.

Typical fields include:

• Project Title
• Innovation Summary
• Problem Identified
• Proposed Solution

Although the portal allows concise descriptions, schools should ensure that every project clearly answers the following questions:

What problem exists?

Describe the issue in simple language.

Who faces the problem?

Identify the users or beneficiaries.

Why is the problem important?

Explain its practical impact.

What is the proposed innovation?

Describe the student’s idea.

Why is it different?

Highlight the originality of the solution.

A clear explanation often makes an innovation much easier to understand during evaluation.

Example Structure for Project Details

Section	Example
Problem	Farmers waste water during irrigation.
Observation	Student observed this during farming activities.
Solution	Smart low-cost water distribution system.
Benefit	Reduces water wastage and saves labour.
Originality	Introduces an improved mechanism for small farms.

Important

Do not describe how the model was made.

Instead, explain:

• the problem,
• the innovation,
• the scientific idea,
• and its usefulness.

Step 6: Enter Student Bank Details

Correct banking information is an important part of the nomination process.

Schools generally enter:

• Bank Name
• Branch
• Account Number
• IFSC Code

Every detail should be verified directly from the student’s passbook before submission. Incorrect banking information may delay future processing where applicable.

Bank Verification Checklist

Before saving bank information, confirm:

✔ Student name matches passbook

✔ Account number is correct

✔ IFSC code is accurate

✔ Branch details are correct

✔ Passbook image is clear

Step 7: Upload Supporting Documents

After entering all student information, required documents are uploaded.

Mandatory Uploads

Passport Photograph

Use a recent photograph with:

• Clear face
• Good lighting
• Plain background
• Proper resolution

Avoid blurred or cropped mobile photographs.

Innovation Synopsis

Upload the innovation write-up in the accepted format.

A strong synopsis should explain:

• The problem
• The proposed innovation
• Scientific basis
• Expected benefits

The synopsis should focus on the idea—not decorative language.

Bank Passbook Copy

Ensure that the uploaded copy clearly shows:

• Student name
• Account number
• IFSC code

Unreadable scans may lead to verification issues.

Optional Supporting Materials

Schools may also upload, where available:

• Prototype photographs
• Design sketches
• Flow diagrams
• Demonstration photographs
• Short videos

These materials help evaluators understand the proposed innovation more effectively.

Image Quality Tips

Poor-quality uploads reduce clarity.

For better presentation:

• Use good lighting.
• Avoid shadows.
• Capture images against plain backgrounds.
• Ensure all text is readable.
• Save files in appropriate formats.

Step 8: Save Student Details

After entering all required information and uploading documents:

Click Save.

The student’s name now appears in the school’s nomination list.

Repeat the same process for every shortlisted student.

Remember the Nomination Limit

Each school may nominate:

• Maximum five students

Within these:

• No more than two Science Stream students from Classes XI and XII combined.

Step 9: Review Every Entry Carefully

This stage is often overlooked but is one of the most important.

Before proceeding further, schools should verify every field.

Review Checklist

✔ Student name

✔ Class

✔ Project title

✔ Innovation summary

✔ Photograph

✔ Bank details

✔ Uploaded documents

✔ File readability

Even a strong innovation can face unnecessary delays if avoidable mistakes remain uncorrected.

Common Review Mistakes

• Typographical errors
• Missing uploads
• Incorrect project title
• Wrong account number
• Blank mandatory fields
• Poor-quality scanned documents

Taking a few extra minutes during review can prevent significant problems later.

Step 10: Enter Authorised School Official Details

Once all nominated students have been added and their details verified, the portal moves to the final authorization stage.

At this point, the school must provide the details of the authorised official who is responsible for approving and forwarding the nominations.

Typically, the following information is required:

Information	Purpose
Principal/Headmaster Name	Official authorization
Designation	Administrative verification
Mobile Number	Communication during evaluation
Email Address	Official correspondence

The authorised official confirms that the information submitted by the school is accurate and that the nominated projects have undergone the prescribed internal screening process.

Why Is This Step Important?

The Principal or Head of Institution is ultimately responsible for ensuring that:

• Student information is correct.
• Projects are genuinely original.
• Documents have been verified.
• School nomination rules have been followed.

This verification adds credibility to the nominations submitted by the school.

Step 11: Forward the Application

After reviewing all student records and entering the authorised official’s details, the school reaches the final submission stage.

Select:

Forward Application

Once this action is completed, the nominated projects are forwarded for district-level scrutiny.

According to the official guidance, District Nodal Officers review submissions and may recommend improvements or reject projects that do not meet the required standards. Schools may receive feedback to improve future nominations where necessary.

Before Clicking “Forward Application”

Take a final pause and verify every detail.

Final Verification Checklist

✔ Student names

✔ Correct classes

✔ Original project titles

✔ Innovation synopsis

✔ Bank information

✔ Supporting documents

✔ Nomination limits

✔ Principal approval

Once the application is forwarded, modifications may not be possible depending on the stage of processing.

Expert Tip

Many schools complete data entry quickly but spend very little time reviewing it.

A structured verification meeting involving the Principal, nodal teacher, and science teachers before forwarding nominations can significantly reduce avoidable errors.

Step 12: Generate the Acknowledgement Receipt

After successful submission, the portal allows schools to generate an acknowledgement receipt.

Select:

Generate Acknowledgement

The acknowledgement generally contains:

• Application Number
• Nomination Reference Number
• Student Details
• Submission Confirmation

Schools should immediately:

• Download the acknowledgement.
• Save a digital copy.
• Print a hard copy for school records.

This receipt serves as an important reference during subsequent communication related to district-, state-, or national-level evaluation.

Why the Acknowledgement Should Be Preserved

The acknowledgement is useful for:

• Tracking nominations
• Future correspondence
• Record keeping
• Verification during later stages

Schools should maintain both digital and printed copies in a dedicated INSPIRE-MANAK file.

Complete Nomination Timeline

The following simplified workflow helps schools understand the overall nomination process.

Idea Generation
        ↓
School-Level Competition
        ↓
Internal Screening
        ↓
Document Collection
        ↓
Portal Login
        ↓
Student Details Entry
        ↓
Project Information Upload
        ↓
Bank Details Verification
        ↓
Document Upload
        ↓
Principal Verification
        ↓
Forward Application
        ↓
Acknowledgement Generation
        ↓
District-Level Scrutiny

Following this sequence carefully reduces errors and improves the quality of submissions.

Common Mistakes During Online Nomination

Many nominations are affected not because the innovation is weak, but because avoidable mistakes occur during submission.

The following issues are among the most common.

Mistake	Why It Creates Problems
Incorrect student name	Verification mismatch
Wrong IFSC code	Banking verification issues
Incorrect account number	Financial processing delays
Blurred passport photograph	Poor identification
Weak project title	Fails to communicate innovation
Very short synopsis	Difficult for evaluators to understand
Missing passbook copy	Incomplete documentation
Uploading on the final day	Greater risk of portal congestion

The official guidance advises schools to complete submissions well before the closing date to avoid heavy portal traffic.

Ten Mistakes That Schools Should Avoid

1. Waiting Until the Last Day

Portal traffic increases significantly near the deadline.

Early submission allows time to correct unexpected issues.

2. Selecting Attractive Models Instead of Strong Ideas

INSPIRE-MANAK rewards innovation—not decoration.

Always evaluate the originality of the idea before considering the appearance of the model.

3. Copying Project Descriptions

Copied descriptions reduce credibility.

Students should explain their ideas in their own words.

Authenticity is more valuable than sophisticated language.

4. Ignoring Originality Checks

Many schools unknowingly nominate ideas that have already been submitted repeatedly.

Originality should always be verified before submission.

5. Weak Project Titles

Compare these examples:

Poor Title

• Science Project
• Best Model
• Agriculture Innovation

Better Title

• Portable Solar Grain Drying Chamber
• Smart Adjustable Harvest Support Device
• Low-Cost Seed Sorting Mechanism

A clear title immediately communicates the purpose of the innovation.

6. Incomplete Documents

Missing files often delay verification.

Before uploading, ensure every required document has been collected.

7. Poor-Quality Scans

Documents should be:

• Properly aligned
• Clearly readable
• Well lit
• Free from shadows

8. Incorrect Student Details

Minor spelling mistakes may later require additional verification.

Cross-check every field carefully.

9. Not Reviewing Before Submission

Always perform one complete review before forwarding applications.

A second review by another teacher is often beneficial.

10. Ignoring School-Level Screening

Uploading every project without proper evaluation reduces the overall quality of nominations.

A structured screening process helps identify the strongest innovations.

Best Practices for Schools

Successful schools generally follow a systematic process throughout the nomination cycle.

Some recommended practices include:

Prepare Documents Offline

Collect and verify all documents before accessing the portal.

Draft the Synopsis First

Prepare and review the innovation summary separately.

Upload only after proofreading.

Verify Bank Information

Cross-check directly with the student’s bank passbook.

Never rely on handwritten notes.

Capture High-Quality Images

Use:

• Good lighting
• Plain background
• High resolution

Quality images improve clarity for evaluators.

Review Every Nomination

Conduct a final verification meeting before forwarding applications.

Maintain Digital Records

Create a folder for each nominated student containing:

• Photograph
• Synopsis
• Bank documents
• Supporting images
• Acknowledgement receipt

This makes future communication much easier.

School Submission Checklist

The following checklist can help schools ensure that every important task has been completed.

School-Level Activities

Task	Status
Idea Competition conducted	□
Internal Screening Committee formed	□
Original ideas shortlisted	□
Principal approval obtained	□

Student Documents

Document	Status
Passport-size photograph	□
Innovation synopsis	□
Bank account details	□
Passbook copy	□
Supporting images (if available)	□

Portal Verification

Verification Item	Status
Student details checked	□
Project title reviewed	□
Synopsis uploaded	□
Documents uploaded	□
Bank details verified	□
Application forwarded	□
Acknowledgement downloaded	□

What Happens After Submission?

Once nominations are forwarded through the E-MIAS portal, they move beyond the school for further scrutiny.

Based on the source material, the next stage involves review by the appropriate district authorities, who examine the submitted innovations for compliance with the scheme’s objectives and requirements. Schools may receive feedback where projects require improvement or do not meet the prescribed standards.

While the exact evaluation process beyond this stage is governed by the programme authorities, schools should retain all records and remain prepared for any future communication regarding their nominated students.

How to Identify Winning Ideas for INSPIRE MANAK

Completing the online nomination process is only one part of participating in the INSPIRE-MANAK Scheme. In reality, the quality of the idea plays a much more significant role than the quality of the model or presentation.

Every year, thousands of projects are prepared by students across India. However, many of them are based on familiar science exhibition topics, copied from websites, or inspired by popular YouTube videos. While these projects may demonstrate scientific concepts effectively, they often do not meet the core objective of INSPIRE-MANAK.

According to the official guidance, INSPIRE-MANAK is designed to identify original science- and technology-based innovations that solve real-life problems rather than showcase textbook experiments. Schools are therefore expected to encourage students to observe their surroundings, think critically, and develop innovative solutions rooted in practical needs.

This section explains how schools, teachers, and students can identify ideas that truly align with the objectives of the scheme.

Quick Answer: What Kind of Ideas Are Suitable for INSPIRE MANAK?

Winning INSPIRE-MANAK ideas usually begin with a real-life problem observed by the student. Instead of demonstrating a known scientific principle, they propose an original or meaningfully improved science- or technology-based solution that is practical, useful, and capable of benefiting individuals or society.

Understanding the Philosophy of Innovation

One of the biggest differences between INSPIRE-MANAK and traditional science competitions lies in the way innovation is defined.

In many school science fairs, students begin by selecting a scientific topic and then prepare a model to demonstrate it.

INSPIRE-MANAK follows the opposite approach.

Instead of asking:

“Which scientific concept shall I demonstrate?”

Students are encouraged to ask:

“What problem have I observed, and how can science or technology help solve it?”

This shift in thinking is the foundation of genuine innovation.

What Is an Idea Competition?

According to the official guidance, an Idea Competition is a structured activity organized within the school to encourage students to identify real-world problems and propose original solutions based on science and technology. Rather than asking students to prepare ready-made models, the competition focuses on discovering innovative thinking through observation, creativity, and problem-solving.

Objectives of an Idea Competition

A well-planned Idea Competition helps schools:

• Discover students with innovative potential.
• Encourage creative thinking.
• Build confidence among young innovators.
• Generate a pool of original ideas.
• Select the most promising innovations transparently.

Instead of preparing only five students for nomination, schools should encourage participation from all eligible students in Classes VI to XII.

This broad participation often leads to unexpected and highly original ideas.

Why Every School Should Organize an Idea Competition

An Idea Competition offers benefits far beyond INSPIRE-MANAK nominations.

Benefit	How It Helps
Encourages curiosity	Students begin observing everyday problems more carefully.
Promotes independent thinking	Students develop their own solutions instead of copying projects.
Improves creativity	Multiple ideas emerge from different experiences.
Supports fair selection	Schools can evaluate a larger pool of innovations.
Builds innovation culture	Creativity becomes a year-round activity rather than a one-time event.

Schools that conduct regular brainstorming sessions often develop stronger innovation ecosystems over time.

Step 1: Introduce Students to Real Innovation

Before asking students to generate ideas, teachers should help them understand what innovation actually means.

Many students mistakenly believe that innovation requires expensive electronic components or advanced robotics.

In reality, innovation often begins with a simple observation.

Teachers can initiate classroom discussions by asking questions such as:

• What daily activity wastes time?
• What task is physically difficult?
• What causes discomfort?
• What problem do your parents face every day?
• What challenge do farmers in your village encounter?
• What issue affects elderly people?

These questions encourage students to think about problems before thinking about solutions.

Discussion Activity for the Classroom

Instead of beginning with project preparation, teachers can organize a discussion using questions like:

Question	Purpose
What problem did you notice this week?	Encourages observation
Who is affected?	Identifies beneficiaries
Why does the problem occur?	Promotes analysis
Has anyone solved it effectively?	Encourages research
Can you think of a better solution?	Stimulates innovation

Such activities help students develop the habit of scientific observation.

Step 2: Present the Three Creativity Challenges

The official training guidance recommends three structured challenges to stimulate innovative thinking. These activities encourage students to move beyond routine science projects and begin designing practical solutions.

Challenge One: Imagine a Machine That Does Not Yet Exist

Students are encouraged to think beyond existing products.

Instead of searching online for project ideas, they should imagine completely new possibilities.

Teachers may ask questions like:

• Which household task takes too much time?
• Which school activity is repetitive?
• Which farming task requires excessive effort?
• What machine would make life easier if it existed?

The objective is not to copy existing inventions but to imagine practical new solutions.

Example Thinking Process

Observation:

Grandmother finds it difficult to carry water.

Question:

Can a simple mechanical device reduce the effort?

Possible innovation:

A portable, easy-to-use water transportation support system.

This example illustrates how innovation grows naturally from observation.

Challenge Two: Improve an Existing Product

Not every innovation needs to be completely new.

Many important inventions are improvements to products people already use.

Students can observe existing tools and ask:

• Can it become lighter?
• Can it become safer?
• Can it use less electricity?
• Can it perform multiple functions?
• Can it reduce physical effort?
• Can it become more affordable?

Meaningful improvements often have significant practical value.

Everyday Products Worth Observing

Students might examine:

• School bags
• Walking sticks
• Agricultural tools
• Kitchen utensils
• Bicycles
• Classroom furniture
• Water containers
• Cleaning equipment

Each product presents opportunities for thoughtful improvement.

Challenge Three: Observe Everyday Problems

The richest source of innovation is everyday life.

Students should carefully observe people around them, including:

• Farmers
• Construction workers
• Street vendors
• Electricians
• Mechanics
• Carpenters
• Tailors
• Shopkeepers
• Sanitation workers
• Elderly people
• Persons with disabilities

Instead of focusing only on technology, students should understand the challenges these individuals face in their daily work.

Questions Students Should Ask

While observing, students should think about:

• Which task takes too long?
• Which activity causes fatigue?
• What creates safety risks?
• What wastes resources?
• What could become easier with scientific thinking?

Such questions often lead to meaningful innovations.

Encourage Observation Instead of Internet Searches

One of the most common mistakes during project preparation is beginning with an internet search.

Students often search:

• “Best INSPIRE MANAK project”
• “Science project ideas”
• “Innovation model”

This approach usually leads to copied or repeated ideas.

Instead, schools should encourage students to:

• Observe their homes.
• Visit farms.
• Explore local markets.
• Watch skilled workers.
• Talk to family members.
• Observe public spaces.

Real innovation usually emerges from real experiences—not from copied project lists.

Create an “Idea Box” in School

The official guidance recommends maintaining an Idea Box where students can submit innovative thoughts throughout the year instead of waiting until the nomination season.

Why an Idea Box Is Effective

Innovative ideas often occur unexpectedly.

A student may think of an idea while:

• Travelling to school.
• Helping parents.
• Watching a local worker.
• Playing with friends.
• Observing a daily activity.

Without a simple way to record these thoughts, many valuable ideas are forgotten.

How to Set Up an Idea Box

Schools can implement this activity with minimal resources.

Step 1

Place a labelled Idea Box in a common area.

Step 2

Provide simple idea slips containing:

• Student name
• Class
• Problem observed
• Proposed solution

Step 3

Collect submissions regularly.

Step 4

Review promising ideas during science club meetings.

Step 5

Guide students in refining their innovations over time.

This continuous process helps schools develop a repository of original ideas before nominations begin.

How to Screen Student Ideas

After collecting ideas, schools need a systematic evaluation process.

Rather than selecting projects based on appearance or complexity, each innovation should be assessed against objective criteria.

Evaluation Framework

Evaluation Criterion	Key Question
Originality	Is the idea genuinely new or meaningfully improved?
Problem Identification	Does it solve a real problem?
Scientific Basis	Is science or technology involved?
Practicality	Can it realistically be developed?
Social Impact	Who benefits from the innovation?
Scalability	Could the idea help more people in the future?

This framework aligns with the objectives emphasized in the official guidance.

The Four Official Elimination Filters

Before finalizing nominations, schools should eliminate projects that fall into categories discouraged by the official guidance.

Filter 1: Non-Scientific or Impractical Ideas

Ideas lacking a clear scientific or technological basis should not proceed.

Filter 2: Commonly Available Ideas

Projects that already exist widely without meaningful improvement generally lack originality.

Filter 3: Standard Science Fair Models

Projects demonstrating textbook concepts—such as the water cycle, photosynthesis, or simple electric circuits—are generally unsuitable because they explain known science rather than introduce innovation.

Filter 4: Essays Without an Innovation

Awareness campaigns or descriptive essays that discuss problems without proposing a specific science- or technology-based solution should also be excluded.

Common Ideas That Should Generally Be Avoided

One of the most valuable resources provided under the INSPIRE-MANAK guidance is the List of Common Ideas. Every year, thousands of students independently think of similar project concepts. While many of these ideas are educational and useful, they have been submitted repeatedly over the years.

This does not automatically mean these topics are prohibited. Rather, the official guidance indicates that such ideas are generally not encouraged unless they contain a significant, original improvement or a genuinely new approach.

Schools should therefore carefully compare shortlisted projects with commonly repeated themes before finalizing nominations.

Water and Environmental Projects

Many projects related to water conservation and environmental protection are submitted every year.

Common examples include:

• Rainwater harvesting
• Water purification systems
• Water level indicators
• Drip irrigation
• Hydroponics
• River-cleaning boats

These topics address important environmental issues. However, unless a student’s solution introduces a meaningful technological innovation beyond existing approaches, such submissions may not demonstrate sufficient originality for INSPIRE-MANAK.

Energy-Related Projects

Renewable energy is another popular area where repeated project ideas are frequently observed.

Examples include:

• Solar cookers
• Solar lighting systems
• Windmills
• Biogas plants
• Footstep power generation
• Gravity batteries

Students interested in renewable energy should focus on identifying a specific real-world problem and proposing an innovative solution rather than recreating familiar demonstration models.

Smart Device Projects

Technology-based ideas attract many students, but several concepts have become common submissions.

Examples include:

• Automatic street lights
• Smart parking systems
• Automatic school bells
• Smart home automation
• Touchless doorbells

To remain competitive, students should demonstrate how their solution is substantially different from existing products or previously submitted ideas.

Safety-Related Projects

Safety innovations continue to be popular.

Frequently repeated topics include:

• Burglar alarms
• Fire alarms
• LPG gas leakage detectors
• Automatic railway gate models
• Earthquake alarms

These ideas often solve genuine problems, but originality remains essential.

Human Anatomy Models

Many students prepare biological models for science exhibitions.

Common examples include:

• Human heart
• Respiratory system
• Digestive system
• Kidney
• Brain
• Cell models

These are excellent educational demonstrations but generally explain existing biological concepts rather than introduce new innovations.

Science Demonstration Models

Traditional science fair projects are generally unsuitable for INSPIRE-MANAK unless they include significant innovation.

Examples include:

• Photosynthesis models
• Electromagnets
• Periscopes
• Microscopes
• Solar system models
• Chandrayaan demonstrations

Such projects primarily illustrate known scientific principles rather than solve practical problems.

Previously Recognized Innovation Themes

The guidance also notes that several once-innovative ideas have been submitted repeatedly over time.

Examples include:

• Smart helmets
• Smart blind sticks
• Shock absorber crutches
• Smart wheelchairs
• Mobile charging shoes
• Smart shopping carts
• Grass cutting machines
• Women safety devices

Students choosing similar themes should carefully explain what makes their innovation genuinely different from existing solutions.

Does This Mean These Topics Are Completely Rejected?

No.

This is an important distinction.

The source material indicates that these are commonly repeated ideas. A project in one of these areas may still be considered if it introduces a substantial, original improvement rather than reproducing an existing concept.

For example:

Common Topic	Weak Submission	Stronger Approach
Smart Helmet	Detects accident	Introduces a genuinely new safety mechanism addressing an unmet need
Solar Cooker	Standard design	Solves a specific limitation observed by users through an original improvement
Water Purifier	Existing filtration model	New science-based solution addressing a practical challenge not solved by current designs

The key question remains:

What is genuinely new about the student’s solution?

How to Verify Originality Before Submission

Originality is one of the most important qualities expected under the scheme.

Before finalizing any nomination, schools should verify whether similar ideas already exist or have been repeatedly submitted.

The official guidance recommends checking originality before uploading projects.

Step 1: Search for Similar Ideas

Teachers should search using different keywords describing the innovation.

The objective is not to discourage students but to determine whether the proposed solution already exists in a similar form.

Step 2: Compare with the Official List of Common Ideas

Review whether the shortlisted innovation resembles any commonly repeated submission.

If it does, ask:

• Has the student introduced a meaningful improvement?
• Does the innovation solve the problem differently?
• Is there a new scientific approach?

Step 3: Discuss the Idea with the Student

Rather than rejecting a similar idea immediately, ask the student questions such as:

• Why did you think of this solution?
• How is it different from existing products?
• What specific problem does it solve?
• Why would someone choose this instead of current alternatives?

Often, these discussions help students refine and strengthen their innovations.

Step 4: Document the Originality

When preparing the project synopsis, clearly explain:

• What already exists.
• What limitation was observed.
• How the student’s idea improves upon it.

This helps evaluators understand why the innovation deserves consideration.

The Role of Teachers in INSPIRE MANAK

Teachers are among the most important contributors to the success of the programme.

However, their role is different from that in a traditional science exhibition.

Rather than designing projects for students, teachers should create an environment that encourages independent thinking.

According to the guidance, teachers may mentor students, refine presentations, improve clarity, and support prototype development, but the core idea should remain the student’s own.

Responsibilities of Teachers

Teachers can contribute by:

• Encouraging curiosity.
• Helping students identify real-life problems.
• Guiding scientific thinking.
• Improving the clarity of project descriptions.
• Reviewing originality before submission.
• Providing constructive feedback.
• Supporting prototype development where feasible.

What Teachers Should Avoid

Teachers should avoid:

• Providing ready-made project ideas.
• Copying projects from the internet.
• Writing the entire synopsis themselves.
• Encouraging students to imitate previous winners.
• Selecting projects solely because they look attractive.

The objective is to nurture innovation—not imitation.

Building a Year-Round Innovation Culture

Successful schools rarely begin preparing only when nominations open.

Instead, they encourage innovation throughout the academic year.

Some practical initiatives include:

• Monthly brainstorming sessions
• Science clubs focused on problem-solving
• Community observation activities
• Innovation notebooks
• Idea-sharing sessions
• Classroom discussions on local challenges

Such activities help students develop observation skills gradually instead of rushing to prepare projects before the deadline.

Innovation Notebook: A Powerful Habit

Teachers can encourage every interested student to maintain an Innovation Notebook.

Whenever students notice a problem, they record:

Observation	Example
Problem noticed	Farmers struggle during harvesting.
Who is affected?	Small farmers
Why does it occur?	Existing tools are uncomfortable.
Possible solution	Adjustable ergonomic harvesting support device
Further improvements	Lightweight, affordable, portable

Over several months, students build a collection of ideas that can later be refined into strong INSPIRE-MANAK nominations.

Signs of a Strong INSPIRE MANAK Idea

Before selecting the final five nominations, schools may ask the following questions.

Does the idea solve a real problem?

The problem should exist in everyday life.

Is the solution science- or technology-based?

The innovation should rely on scientific thinking rather than awareness alone.

Is the idea original?

Students should clearly explain how their solution differs from existing approaches.

Is it practical?

The innovation should appear reasonably achievable.

Can it benefit others?

Projects with meaningful social impact are often more valuable than ideas solving highly isolated problems.

Can the student explain it confidently?

If the student cannot explain the problem or the innovation clearly, the idea may require further refinement.

Final Screening Checklist for Schools

Before confirming nominations, verify the following:

Question	Yes/No
Does the project solve a real-life problem?	□
Is science or technology involved?	□
Has originality been checked?	□
Does it avoid common science fair models?	□
Can the student explain the innovation independently?	□
Has the synopsis been reviewed?	□
Has the internal committee approved the idea?	□

Completing this checklist helps schools select stronger, more competitive nominations.

How to Write a Winning INSPIRE MANAK Project Synopsis

A project synopsis is one of the most important components of an INSPIRE-MANAK nomination. It is the document through which evaluators first understand the student’s innovation. A well-structured synopsis explains what problem has been identified, why it matters, how the proposed solution works, and what makes it original.

According to the uploaded source, the synopsis should focus on clarity, originality, scientific thinking, and practical usefulness, rather than decorative language or lengthy descriptions.

Why Is the Synopsis Important?

A good innovation can lose its impact if it is not explained properly.

An effective synopsis helps evaluators quickly understand:

• The real-life problem
• The student’s observation
• The proposed innovation
• The scientific principle involved
• The expected benefits
• The originality of the solution

Remember, the synopsis is not an essay or a research paper. It is a concise explanation of the innovation.

Recommended Synopsis Structure

Schools can guide students to organize their synopsis using the following structure.

1. Title of the Innovation

Choose a short, specific, and meaningful title.

Weak Titles

• Science Project
• Smart Device
• Agriculture Model

Better Titles

• Portable Solar Grain Drying System
• Adjustable Ergonomic Harvesting Tool
• Low-Cost Water Distribution Controller

A good title immediately tells the evaluator what the innovation is about.

2. Problem Statement

Clearly describe the real-world problem.

Answer questions such as:

• What is the problem?
• Who faces it?
• Why is it important?

Keep the language simple and factual.

3. Observation

Explain how the student identified the problem.

Examples of observations include:

• Daily household activities
• Agricultural work
• School environment
• Local transportation
• Community challenges

This section demonstrates that the innovation emerged from genuine observation rather than being copied.

4. Existing Solutions and Their Limitations

Briefly explain:

• What solutions already exist?
• Why are they insufficient?
• What difficulties remain?

Avoid criticizing existing technologies. Instead, explain the specific limitation that inspired the student’s idea.

5. Proposed Innovation

Describe:

• What the innovation is.
• How it addresses the identified problem.
• Why it is different.

This is the core of the synopsis.

6. Scientific Principle

Explain the scientific or technological concept involved.

The explanation should be understandable without excessive technical terminology.

7. Expected Benefits

Mention the anticipated advantages.

Possible areas include:

• Time savings
• Cost reduction
• Safety improvement
• Reduced physical effort
• Environmental protection
• Better accessibility
• Increased efficiency

Focus on practical outcomes.

8. Originality

One of the most important parts of the synopsis is explaining what makes the innovation different.

Students should answer questions such as:

• What is new?
• What improvement has been introduced?
• Why is this solution unique?

Originality should be explained clearly rather than merely claimed.

Writing Tips

According to the guidance reflected in the source material, students should:

• Write in simple language.
• Use short, clear sentences.
• Explain the problem before the solution.
• Avoid unnecessary technical jargon.
• Describe their own observations.
• Ensure that the synopsis reflects their own understanding of the innovation.

Common Synopsis Mistakes

Schools should help students avoid mistakes such as:

• Writing lengthy essays instead of concise explanations.
• Copying text from websites.
• Focusing only on the model rather than the innovation.
• Ignoring the originality of the idea.
• Using vague statements without explaining the actual problem.
• Making unsupported claims about the innovation.

A concise, authentic synopsis is usually more effective than an overly complex one.

What Evaluators Generally Look For

Based on the uploaded source, evaluators generally consider factors such as:

Criterion	What It Means
Originality	Is the idea genuinely new or meaningfully improved?
Scientific Thinking	Is the solution based on science or technology?
Practical Usefulness	Can it solve a real problem?
Clarity	Is the idea explained clearly?
Social Relevance	Will it benefit individuals or society?
Feasibility	Does the idea appear practical and achievable?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme?

It is an innovation programme of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), implemented with the National Innovation Foundation (NIF) – India, to encourage original science- and technology-based ideas from school students.

2. Who can participate?

Students studying in Classes VI to XII in recognized schools are eligible, subject to the scheme’s guidelines.

3. Can students apply directly?

No. Nominations are submitted by recognized schools through the E-MIAS portal after internal screening.

4. How many students can a school nominate?

A school may nominate up to five students, with the prescribed limit for Science Stream students of Classes XI and XII combined.

5. Can ideas be submitted in regional languages?

Yes. The source states that submissions may be made in any of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India.

6. Are team projects allowed?

The uploaded source emphasizes individual student nominations.

7. Is a working model compulsory?

The source highlights the importance of the innovation itself. Supporting materials such as photographs or prototypes may be uploaded where available, but the central focus remains the originality of the idea.

8. Are copied ideas accepted?

No. Originality is a fundamental expectation of the scheme, and schools are encouraged to verify originality before submitting nominations.

9. What happens after nomination?

Submitted nominations proceed through further scrutiny and evaluation as outlined in the scheme’s selection process.

10. Why do some projects fail?

Common reasons include lack of originality, weak problem identification, incomplete documentation, poor synopsis writing, and submission of conventional science exhibition models instead of genuine innovations.

Best Practices for Schools

Schools can strengthen participation by adopting a year-round approach to innovation.

Some recommended practices include:

• Conduct regular Idea Competitions.
• Maintain an Idea Box for student submissions.
• Encourage Innovation Notebooks.
• Organize brainstorming sessions.
• Discuss local community problems in science classes.
• Guide students without providing ready-made ideas.
• Verify originality before nominations.
• Preserve complete documentation for each nominated student.

These practices help create a sustained culture of creativity rather than limiting innovation activities to the nomination period.

Master Checklist

Student Checklist

• □ Identified a real-life problem
• □ Proposed an original solution
• □ Prepared a clear synopsis
• □ Verified originality
• □ Submitted required documents

Teacher Checklist

• □ Guided observation activities
• □ Reviewed the innovation
• □ Verified scientific basis
• □ Checked originality
• □ Helped improve clarity without altering the student’s idea

School Checklist

• □ Conducted an Idea Competition
• □ Formed an internal screening committee
• □ Shortlisted the best innovations
• □ Verified documents
• □ Submitted nominations before the deadline
• □ Downloaded the acknowledgement receipt

Conclusion

The INSPIRE-MANAK Scheme represents much more than a school competition—it is an initiative to nurture scientific curiosity, creativity, and problem-solving among young learners. By encouraging students to observe real-life challenges and develop original science- and technology-based solutions, the programme helps cultivate the next generation of innovators who can contribute meaningfully to society.

For schools, success in INSPIRE-MANAK depends on creating an environment where observation, experimentation, and independent thinking become everyday habits. Structured Idea Competitions, careful internal screening, authentic mentoring, and timely, accurate nominations all contribute to stronger participation.

For students, the most valuable lesson is that innovation does not begin with expensive equipment or complex technology. It begins with noticing a genuine problem, asking thoughtful questions, and applying scientific thinking to develop a practical solution. A simple but original idea that addresses a real need can often have greater impact than an elaborate model based on familiar concepts.

As you prepare for the INSPIRE MANAK Scheme 2026–27, focus on originality, clarity, and practical usefulness. Encourage curiosity, learn from everyday experiences, and let innovation grow from observation rather than imitation.

For more trusted educational guides, government education updates, CBSE/KVS resources, teaching materials, competitive exam content, and student-focused learning resources, continue exploring PYQLY.COM. By staying informed and nurturing innovation at every stage of learning, schools, teachers, parents, and students can work together to build a stronger culture of scientific inquiry and creative problem-solving.

Link to download the books:

1.      https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/others/Teachers-Handbook-for-nurturing-students-English.pdf

2.      https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/others/Teachers-Handbook-nurturing-Hindi.pdf

3.      https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/others/Abhinav-Kahaniya-Hindi.pdf

4.      https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/others/Abhinav-Kahaniya-English.pdf

5.      https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/brochure/INSPIRE-MANAK-Brochure_English.pdf

6.     What kind of submissions will not be encouraged?

https://inspireawards-dst.gov.in/download/list-of-common-ideas.pdf

Video Link:

1. How to shortlist best ideas at school level for INSPIRE-MANAK- 

2. Guidelines for Student Nomination for INSPIRE MANAK-